Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Vizuālā analogā skala sāpēm× | Glāzgovas komas skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Klīniskā novērtēšana | Klīniskā novērtēšana |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads | 1974 | 1974 |
| Autors≠ | E. Carl Huskisson | Graham Teasdale and Bryan Jennett |
| Tips≠ | Pain intensity measurement | Consciousness and neurological assessment |
| Pirmavots≠ | Huskisson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2(7889), 1127-1131. DOI ↗ | Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81-84. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | VAS, Pain VAS, Visual Rating Scale | GCS, Glasgow Scale |
| Saistītās | 2 | 2 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10-centimeter line for measuring pain intensity, developed by Huskisson in 1974. Patients mark their current pain level along the continuum from no pain to worst pain imaginable. It remains one of the most widely used single-item pain measures in clinical practice and research. | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), developed by Teasdale and Jennett in 1974, is a 15-point scale used to assess level of consciousness and severity of brain injury. It evaluates eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, making it the gold standard tool for rapid neurological assessment in trauma, emergency, and intensive care settings. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|