ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Laika griezumā sistemātiska literatūras apskats×Sistemātiska literatūras apskate×
NozareZinātnometrijaZinātnometrija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2010s1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
AutorsAdapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
TipsSystematic review variant with temporal segmentationEvidence synthesis methodology
PirmavotsZupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
Citi nosaukumitemporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature reviewSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsA time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Time-sliced Systematic literature review · Systematic Literature Review. Izgūts 2026-06-20 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare