Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Teksta tīklu analīze× | Sentimentu analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Teksta ieguve | Teksta ieguve |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2011 (Paranyushkin); 2005 (Diesner & Carley) | — |
| Autors≠ | Dmitry Paranyushkin; Jana Diesner & Kathleen M. Carley | — |
| Tips≠ | Text-mining network method | NLP text-classification task |
| Pirmavots≠ | Paranyushkin, D. (2011). Identifying the Pathways for Meaning Circulation Using Text Network Analysis. Nodus Labs. link ↗ | Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | semantic network analysis, word co-occurrence network, Metin Ağ Analizi (Text Network Analysis) | opinion mining, polarity detection, duygu analizi |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Text network analysis models the words or concepts in a text as nodes and their co-occurrences as edges, then uses network metrics to reveal the structure of meaning. The approach was advanced by Diesner and Carley (2005) for communication networks and by Paranyushkin (2011) for tracing the pathways of meaning circulation in text. | Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, is a natural-language-processing task that detects the emotional tone of text — typically classifying it as positive, negative, or neutral. It turns unstructured opinion text into structured, quantifiable polarity signals using one of three families of approaches: sentiment lexicons, trained machine-learning classifiers, or pretrained transformer models. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|