Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Tehnoloģiskās gatavības indekss× | Anketas tehnoloģiju pieņemšanas modelis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Informācijas sistēmas | Informācijas sistēmas |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2000 | 1989 |
| Autors≠ | Ajay Parasuraman | Fred Davis |
| Tips | Likert-scale questionnaire | Likert-scale questionnaire |
| Pirmavots≠ | Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined Technology Readiness Index. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74. DOI ↗ | Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | TRI, Parasuraman Technology Readiness | TAM, Davis TAM |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Technology Readiness Index (TRI) was developed by Ajay Parasuraman in 2000 to measure individual propensity to adopt and use new technologies. The TRI assesses a person's personal attitudes toward technology across four dimensions: optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, and insecurity. Updated in 2015 with a streamlined 16-item version, the TRI helps identify technology adopter segments and predict behavior across diverse technology contexts. | The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is a foundational framework introduced by Fred Davis in 1989 to explain user adoption of information technology. Published in MIS Quarterly, TAM posits that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the primary determinants of technology acceptance, regardless of an individual's prior computer experience or technical background. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|