Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| STROBE kontrolsaraksts: Standarti novērojumu pētījumu ziņošanai× | CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Checklist× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētniecības metodoloģija | Pētniecības metodoloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2007 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| Autors≠ | Von Elm et al. (STROBE Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| Tips≠ | Study author reporting checklist | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| Pirmavots≠ | Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | STROBE | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) is a 22-item evidence-based checklist published in 2007 by Von Elm et al. to improve the quality of reporting of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Like CONSORT for RCTs, STROBE is endorsed by over 300 journals and is widely considered the reporting standard for observational epidemiological research. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|