ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Speech Act Analysis×Sarunu analīze×
NozareValodniecībaKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1962Late 1960s–1974 (foundational lectures 1964–1972; landmark article 1974)
AutorsJ. L. Austin and John R. Searle (analytic method derived from speech act theory)Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
TipsQualitative pragmatic coding of utterances for illocutionary forceQualitative research method
PirmavotsAustin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198245537Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiIllocutionary Force Analysis, Speech Act Coding, Pragmatic Act AnalysisCA, talk-in-interaction, sequential analysis, interactional analysis
Saistītās46
KopsavilkumsSpeech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.Conversation Analysis (CA) is a qualitative research method that examines the fine-grained sequential structure of naturally occurring talk and social interaction. Developed by sociologists Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the 1960s and 1970s, CA investigates how participants in a conversation accomplish social actions — such as invitations, refusals, or diagnoses — through the precise moment-by-moment organisation of their talk, including turn-taking, sequence structure, repair, and recipient design.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Speech Act Analysis · Conversation Analysis. Izgūts 2026-06-25 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare