ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Programmatūras sarežģītības metriks×Defektu prognozēšanas modelis×
NozareProgrammatūras inženierijaProgrammatūras inženierija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19762005
AutorsThomas J. McCabeThomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Tipsquantitative measurementmachine learning model
PirmavotsMcCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumicode complexity analysis, complexity measurementfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsSoftware complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Software Complexity Metrics · Defect Prediction Model. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare