Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Sociālā kapitāla indekss× | Institucionālā uzticēšanās skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Politiskā socioloģija | Politiskā socioloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1986–2000 | 1975–2011 |
| Autors≠ | Pierre Bourdieu, Robert Putnam, Michael Woolcock | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris |
| Tips≠ | Self-report questionnaire / Behavioral frequency | Self-report questionnaire |
| Pirmavots≠ | Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. link ↗ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | SCI, Social Capital Scale | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Social Capital Index measures the stock of social connections, networks, and civic participation within an individual's or community's social ecosystem. Rooted in the theoretical work of Pierre Bourdieu and popularized by Robert Putnam, social capital encompasses bonding capital (ties within homogeneous groups), bridging capital (ties across different groups), and linking capital (connections to institutions and power). Comprehensive indices assess networks, trust, organizational membership, volunteering, and informal mutual aid. | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|