Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ranžēšana pēc pārākuma un nepārākuma× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2001 | 1980 |
| Autors≠ | Xu, X. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tips≠ | Outranking-utility hybrid (PROMETHEE+SAW+TOPSIS) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Xu, X. (2001). The SIR method: A superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | SIR (Superiority and Inferiority Ranking) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, X. in 2001. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|