ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Vienkāršs vienpusēji akls kontrolēts pētījums×Pragmatiskais randomizētais kontrolētais pētījums×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology1967
AutorsBradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelinesDaniel Schwartz and Joseph Lellouch
TipsExperimental design — blinded randomized trialExperimental design — pragmatic trial
PirmavotsSchulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumisingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCTpRCT, pragmatic trial, practical clinical trial, real-world RCT
Saistītās54
KopsavilkumsA single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial · Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare