ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Vienkāršs vienpusēji akls kontrolēts pētījums×Kopas (klasteru) randomizēts kontrolēts pētījums×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology1978–1980s
AutorsBradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelinesCornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s)
TipsExperimental design — blinded randomized trialExperimental design
PirmavotsSchulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978
Citi nosaukumisingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCTcluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment
Saistītās54
KopsavilkumsA single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial · Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare