Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Īsformu skalu izstrāde× | Mēroga izstrāde× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1991–1995 |
| Autors≠ | Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002) | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Tips≠ | Scale development methodology | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Citi nosaukumi | scale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|