ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Īsās formas uzticamības analīze×Test-retest uzticamība×
NozarePsihometrijaPsihometrija
SaimeLatent structureLatent structure
Izcelsmes gads1990s–2000s1904
AutorsConventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002)Karl Pearson
TipsScale development / psychometric evaluationReliability estimate
PirmavotsStanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497
Citi nosaukumiabbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliabilitystability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability
Saistītās64
KopsavilkumsShort-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality.Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Short-form reliability analysis · Test-Retest Reliability. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare