Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Saīsinātās formas nomoloģiskā validitāte× | Diskriminantā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|