Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Īsās formas vienumu analīze× | Mēroga izstrāde× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1991–1995 |
| Autors≠ | Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Tips≠ | Item selection and evaluation procedure | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Citi nosaukumi | abbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|