Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Īsformu satura validitāte× | Konverģentā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1995–2000 | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | Messick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Validity evaluation | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | abbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short forms | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Short-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|