Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Mēroga izstrāde× | Satura validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1991–1995 | 1975 |
| Autors≠ | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| Tips≠ | Multi-step methodological framework | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| Pirmavots≠ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|