ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Analīze audu inženierijas balstu poru struktūrai×Mikro-CT morfometrija×
NozareBiomehānikaBiomehānika
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads20001989
AutorsDietmar HutmacherFeldkamp
TipsQuantitative morphological analysis3D image acquisition and quantitative analysis
PirmavotsHutmacher, D. W. (2000). Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21(24), 2529-2543. DOI ↗Feldkamp, L. A., Davis, L. C., & Kress, J. W. (1984). Practical cone-beam algorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(6), 612-619. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiPore size distribution, Porosity measurement, Scaffold characterizationmicroCT, Micro-CT analysis, 3D bone morphometry
Saistītās33
KopsavilkumsScaffold porosity analysis characterizes the pore structure of tissue engineering scaffolds, including total porosity, pore size distribution, pore shape, and pore interconnectivity. Essential for predicting cell seeding, nutrient diffusion, and mechanical properties, this quantitative approach bridges scaffold design and biological performance.Micro-computed tomography (microCT) morphometry quantifies 3D bone and tissue architecture at micrometer resolution, enabling detailed assessment of bone density, trabecular structure, and porosity. Developed by Feldkamp and colleagues and standardized by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, microCT is the gold standard for preclinical bone analysis and has expanded to tissue engineering and material characterization.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Scaffold Porosity Analysis · Micro-CT Morphometry. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare