ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Metode “Vērtību diapazons”×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads19931995
AutorsYakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipsInterval utility (optimistic–pessimistic bounds)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
PirmavotsYakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. (1993). Multi-attribute decision making: Dominance with respect to an importance order of the attributes. Applied Mathematics and Computation DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsROV (Range of Value method) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yakowitz, D. S., Lane, L. J., Szidarovszky, F. in 1993. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: ROV · CRITIC. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare