ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Klasifikācija iežu masām×Ģeomehānisko modelēšana×
NozareZemes zinātnesZemes zinātnes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19741900s
AutorsBieniawski and BartonCoulomb and Mohr
Tipsengineering geology assessment pipelinerock behavior prediction pipeline
PirmavotsBieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗Jaeger, J. C., & Cook, N. G. W. (1979). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiRMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designationmechanical earth modeling, stress modeling, rock mechanics simulation
Saistītās45
KopsavilkumsRock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.Geomechanical modeling is the numerical simulation of stress and deformation in rock masses, integrating rock properties, pressure conditions, and geometric constraints. Rooted in classical mechanics (Coulomb, Mohr) but modernized by finite element and finite difference methods, this approach is essential for well integrity assessment, reservoir compaction prediction, and stability evaluation of slopes and excavations. Models link subsurface geology to rock mechanical behavior.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Rock Mass Classification · Geomechanical Modeling. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare