Salīdzināt metodes

	Robustais Filipsa-Perona (PP) vienības saknes tests	Robustais papildinātais Dekija-Fullera vienības saknes tests
Nozare	Ekonometrija	Ekonometrija
Saime	Regression model	Regression model
Izcelsmes gads	1988 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions)	1996-2001
Autors	Phillips & Perron (1988); robustification by Cavaliere & Taylor (2008) and related authors	Ng and Perron (2001); Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996)
Tips	Unit root / stationarity test	Unit root / stationarity test
Pirmavots	Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.	Ng, S., and Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554.
Citi nosaukumi	robust Phillips-Perron test, heteroskedasticity-robust PP test, nonparametric robust unit root test, robust PP	robust ADF test, HAC-corrected ADF, heteroscedasticity-robust unit root test, GLS-detrended ADF
Saistītās	6	6
Kopsavilkums	The Robust Phillips-Perron unit root test extends the classical PP test by applying corrections — such as heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance estimation or wild-bootstrap critical values — that maintain valid inference when the error variance of a time series is non-constant or exhibits unconditional heteroskedasticity, conditions under which the standard PP test is severely size-distorted.	The Robust ADF unit root test extends the classical ADF procedure with improvements that correct for size distortions arising from heteroscedastic or serially correlated errors, and from poor lag-length selection. Drawing on GLS detrending (Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock 1996) and modified information criteria (Ng and Perron 2001), it delivers reliable size and power in the presence of non-standard error processes common in macroeconomic and financial time series.