ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Pētījumi par robustu modeļu testēšanu×Pētījumi modeļu testēšanai×
NozarePētījuma dizainsPētījuma dizains
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1988–19981970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s
AutorsAlbert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai YuanKarl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition
TipsQuantitative model-testing research design with robust estimationConfirmatory quantitative research design
PirmavotsSatorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344
Citi nosaukumirobust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation researchmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR
Saistītās65
KopsavilkumsRobust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached.Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Robust Model Testing Research · Model Testing Research. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare