ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Robustā Hausmana specifikācijas pārbaude×Savvaļas bootstrap regresijas inferencē×
NozareStatistikaStatistika
SaimeRegression modelRegression model
Izcelsmes gads19781986
AutorsHausman (1978); robust variant after Arellano (1993)Wu (1986); refined by Davidson & Flachaire (2008)
TipsPanel model specification testResampling-based regression inference
PirmavotsHausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. DOI ↗Wu, C. F. J. (1986). Jackknife, Bootstrap and Other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis. Annals of Statistics, 14(4), 1261-1295. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumirobust hausman specification test, cluster-robust hausman test, Robust Hausman Testiwild bootstrap, wild cluster bootstrap, Wu-Liu resampling, Wild Bootstrap
Saistītās55
KopsavilkumsThe Robust Hausman Test is a heteroscedasticity- and autocorrelation-robust version of the Hausman specification test, used to choose between fixed-effects and random-effects estimators in panel-data models. It builds on Hausman's 1978 test and the robust treatment of correlated effects developed by Arellano (1993).The wild bootstrap is a resampling method for regression models with heteroscedastic errors, introduced by Wu (1986) and refined by Davidson and Flachaire (2008). It builds a bootstrap distribution by rescaling each fitted residual with a random sign, so that standard errors and confidence intervals stay valid when the error variance is not constant or the data are clustered.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Robust Hausman Test · Wild Bootstrap. Izgūts 2026-06-17 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare