Salīdzināt metodes

	Robustas diskriminantās validitātes pārbaude	Konverģentā validitāte
Nozare	Psihometrija	Psihometrija
Saime	Latent structure	Latent structure
Izcelsmes gads	1959 (foundational); 2015 (HTMT criterion)	1959
Autors	Henseler, Ringle & Sarstedt (HTMT); Campbell & Fiske (foundational framework)	Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
Tips	Validity assessment / measurement quality criterion	Validity evidence / construct validation
Pirmavots	Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.	Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
Citi nosaukumi	HTMT criterion, heterotrait-monotrait ratio, discriminant validity testing, RDV	convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Saistītās	4	4
Kopsavilkums	Robust discriminant validity assessment determines whether distinct latent constructs in a measurement model are sufficiently different from one another. Unlike traditional AVE-based approaches, robust methods such as the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio use the pattern of inter-indicator correlations to provide a more sensitive and simulation-validated criterion for judging discriminant validity in structural equation modeling contexts.	Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.