Salīdzināt metodes

	Principi pētniecības integritātes	Interešu konflikts pētniecībā
Nozare	Pētniecības ētika	Pētniecības ētika
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2007	2013
Autors	Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards)	Multiple (NIH, ICMJE, institutional COI policies)
Tips	Framework	Guideline
Pirmavots	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press.	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE Recommendations for Manuscript Authorship.
Citi nosaukumi	Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards	COI, Conflicts of Interest
Saistītās	4	3
Kopsavilkums	Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust.	A conflict of interest (COI) in research exists when a researcher has financial, professional, or personal interests that might bias their research judgment or outcomes. Conflicts are inherent in research communities—researchers often have legitimate stakes in their research's success—but unmanaged conflicts compromise research integrity and public trust. Managing COI requires transparent disclosure, institutional oversight, and proactive mitigation strategies to minimize bias risk while allowing legitimate research to proceed.