Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Pētījuma dienasgrāmata× | Narativā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Aptauju metodoloģija | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| Autors≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|