Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Reliģiskās apņemšanās inventārs-10 (RCI-10)× | Iekšējās un ārējās reliģiozitātes skala (I/Ā skala)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Reliģijas psiholoģija | Reliģijas psiholoģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003 | 1967 |
| Autors≠ | Everett L. Worthington Jr., Nathaniel G. Wade, Tamara L. Hight, Jennifer S. Ripley, Michael E. McCullough, & others | Gordon W. Allport & J. Michael Ross |
| Tips | Self-report | Self-report |
| Pirmavots≠ | Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., ... Schmitt, M. M. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 84–96. DOI ↗ | Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | RCI-10, Religious Commitment | I/E Scale, Allport-Ross Scale |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Religious Commitment Inventory-10 (RCI-10), developed by Worthington and colleagues in 2003, is a brief 10-item self-report measure of religious commitment: the degree to which an individual dedicates themselves to religious beliefs, practices, and community. The RCI-10 distinguishes between two dimensions of commitment: Intrapersonal (personal faith conviction, spiritual discipline, religious significance) and Interpersonal (engagement with faith community, public religious identity, shared practices). It has become widely used in counseling psychology, pastoral care, and research on religiosity and well-being to assess the strength and breadth of religious dedication. | The I/E Scale, originally developed by Allport and Ross in 1967, is a foundational measure in the psychology of religion that distinguishes between two motivational orientations toward religion: intrinsic (religion as end in itself, source of meaning) versus extrinsic (religion as means to social, personal, or practical ends). This conceptual distinction has profoundly influenced decades of research on religious prejudice, moral behavior, and health outcomes. The original 20-item version has been refined to a 14-item form (I/E-Revised) that improves psychometric properties while maintaining theoretical clarity. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|