Salīdzināt metodes

	Regulārizēts lēmumu koks	Regulārā lineārā regresija
Nozare	Mašīnmācīšanās	Mašīnmācīšanās
Saime	Machine learning	Machine learning
Izcelsmes gads	1984	1970–2005
Autors	Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C.	Hoerl & Kennard (Ridge, 1970); Tibshirani (Lasso, 1996); Zou & Hastie (Elastic Net, 2005)
Tips	Supervised learning (regularized tree)	Penalized linear model
Pirmavots	Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth. ISBN: 978-0-412-04841-8	Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288.
Citi nosaukumi	pruned decision tree, cost-complexity pruned tree, penalized decision tree, constrained CART	Ridge regression, Lasso regression, Elastic Net regression, penalized regression
Saistītās	6	4
Kopsavilkums	A regularized decision tree is a decision tree model whose complexity is intentionally limited through pruning, depth constraints, or penalty terms to prevent overfitting. Rooted in Breiman et al.'s CART framework (1984), regularization converts the greedy tree-growing procedure into a bias-variance tradeoff, yielding models that generalize better to unseen data than fully-grown trees.	Regularized linear regression adds a penalty term to the ordinary least-squares objective, shrinking or zeroing out coefficients to reduce overfitting and handle multicollinearity. The three main variants — Ridge (L2 penalty), Lasso (L1 penalty), and Elastic Net (combined L1+L2) — make linear regression usable even when features outnumber observations or predictors are highly correlated.