Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Kārtējā daudz-kritēriju metode, kas balstīta uz pāru režīmu analīzi× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1983 | 1980 |
| Autors≠ | Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tips≠ | Pairwise regime matrix aggregation (ordinal weights) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (1983). Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning. Regional Science and Urban Economics DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | REGIME (Ordinal multi-criteria method based on pairwise regime analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|