ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Daudzlīmeņu jaukto metožu dizains ar kvalitatīvo dominanci×Kvalitatīvi dominējošs transformatīvs jaukto metožu dizains×
NozarePētījuma dizainsPētījuma dizains
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s–2010s2003–2010
AutorsTashakkori & Teddlie; Leech & OnwuegbuzieDonna M. Mertens (transformative framework); John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (weighting typology)
TipsMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
PirmavotsTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593856267
Citi nosaukumiQUAL-dominant multilevel MMR, qualitative-priority multilevel mixed methods, qual-dominant nested multilevel design, QUAL+quan multilevel designQUAL-dominant transformative MMR, qualitative-priority transformative design, QUAL+ transformative mixed methods, transformative mixed methods with qualitative priority
Saistītās46
KopsavilkumsQualitative-dominant multilevel mixed methods design addresses research questions nested across two or more social levels — such as individuals within classrooms within schools — while assigning primary inferential weight to the qualitative strand. Quantitative data collected at one or more levels serve a supporting role: they contextualize, corroborate, or sharpen qualitative findings rather than generate the principal conclusions. The design is especially productive when understanding processes and meanings at multiple organizational layers is more important than population-level statistical estimates.Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods is a mixed methods research design in which qualitative data carry the primary evidential weight while quantitative data serve a supplementary role, and the entire inquiry is governed by a transformative theoretical framework — one committed to social justice, equity, and the amplification of marginalized voices. The design produces rich contextual understanding alongside statistical corroboration to advance emancipatory or advocacy-oriented goals.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Qualitative-dominant multilevel mixed methods · Qualitative-dominant transformative mixed methods. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare