Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Qualitative Comparative Analysis× | Procesa izsekošana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Political Science | Psihometrija |
| Saime≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1987 | 2005 |
| Autors≠ | Charles C. Ragin | Alexander George, Andrew Bennett |
| Tips≠ | Set-theoretic, configurational comparative method | Qualitative causal inference |
| Pirmavots≠ | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347 | Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | QCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method | — |
| Saistītās≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry. | Process Tracing is a qualitative research method developed by George and Bennett (2005) for studying causal mechanisms and causal chains within individual cases. It involves examining the sequence of events and decision-making processes within a case to infer whether a hypothesized causal mechanism actually operated. Process tracing aims to strengthen causal inference in case studies by looking beyond correlation to understand how causes produce effects. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|