Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Media Priming Experiment× | Analīze mediju dienaskārtības noteikšanai× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Communication | Mediju studijas |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1987 | 1972 |
| Autors≠ | Shanto Iyengar & Donald Kinder | Maxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw |
| Tips≠ | Experiment testing how media attention changes the standards used to evaluate | Empirical method for studying how media coverage affects issue salience and public concern |
| Pirmavots≠ | Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226388571 | McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Priming analysis, News priming experiment, Agenda priming study, Medya Hazırlama Deneyi | agenda-setting theory, media agenda analysis, issue salience |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Media priming is the process by which news attention to some issues, and not others, changes the standards people use to evaluate leaders, policies, or events. Demonstrated experimentally by Iyengar and Kinder in News That Matters, the priming experiment manipulates which issues the news emphasizes and tests whether those issues subsequently weigh more heavily in audiences' judgments — the natural extension of agenda setting from importance to evaluation. | Agenda-Setting Analysis is an empirical method for investigating the influence of media coverage on what issues the public considers important. Developed by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw (1972), the approach tests a core hypothesis about media effects: media coverage does not tell people what to think, but rather what to think about. By comparing the issues receiving media coverage with the issues the public identifies as important, researchers measure agenda-setting effects—the degree to which media attention predicts public concern. The method demonstrates media's power to structure the hierarchy of issues, even when media may not directly persuade on specific issues. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|