Salīdzināt metodes

	Pragmatiskais Zālamana četru grupu dizains	Dizains "Solomon Four-Group"
Nozare	Eksperimentu plānošana	Eksperimentu plānošana
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	1949 (Solomon design); pragmatic variant in applied use from 1990s onward	1949
Autors	Solomon four-group design: Richard L. Solomon (1949); pragmatic orientation formalized by Schwartz & Lellouch (1967) and Thorpe et al. (2009)	Richard L. Solomon
Tips	Experimental design (pragmatic variant)	True experimental design
Pirmavots	Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150.	Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150.
Citi nosaukumi	pragmatic S4GD, real-world Solomon four-group design, pragmatic pretest-control design, pragmatic Solomon design	Solomon design, four-group design, Solomon four-group control design, S4GD
Saistītās	5	5
Kopsavilkums	The Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group Design combines the pretest-sensitization control logic of the classic Solomon (1949) four-group structure with the broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and real-world conditions characteristic of pragmatic trials. Four groups are formed: two receive the intervention (one pretested, one not) and two serve as controls (one pretested, one not), allowing simultaneous estimation of treatment effects and pretest sensitization effects under ecologically valid settings.	The Solomon Four-Group Design extends the classic pretest-posttest control-group design by adding two groups that receive no pretest, enabling researchers to detect whether the pretest itself alters participants' responses to the treatment. Introduced by Richard L. Solomon in 1949, it remains the gold standard for isolating the independent effect of a pretest and for obtaining unbiased estimates of treatment efficacy.