ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Pragmatiskais randomizētais kontrolētais pētījums×Kopas (klasteru) randomizēts kontrolēts pētījums×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19671978–1980s
AutorsDaniel Schwartz and Joseph LellouchCornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s)
TipsExperimental design — pragmatic trialExperimental design
PirmavotsSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978
Citi nosaukumipRCT, pragmatic trial, practical clinical trial, real-world RCTcluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsA pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions.A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial · Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare