Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Pragmatiskais randomizētais klīniskais pētījums× | Daudscentru randomizēts klīniskais pētījums× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Epidemioloģija | Epidemioloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1967 | 1970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials) |
| Autors≠ | Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch | Evolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s |
| Tips≠ | Interventional study design | Interventional experimental design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 |
| Citi nosaukumi | pragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial | multi-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009. | A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|