ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Pragmatisks laboratorijas eksperiments×Randomizēts kontrolēts pētījums (RCT)×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
Izcelsmes gads1967 (foundational distinction); 2009 (PRECIS operationalization)1948
AutorsSchwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic–explanatory distinction); extended by PRECIS framework developersJames Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
TipsExperimental design philosophy and study typeInterventional comparative study
PirmavotsSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumipragmatic experiment, applied laboratory trial, practice-oriented lab experiment, pragmatic controlled experimentRCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
Saistītās37
KopsavilkumsA pragmatic laboratory experiment is a controlled study conducted in a laboratory setting that prioritises external validity and real-world applicability over the stringent internal controls characteristic of purely explanatory experiments. Drawing on the pragmatic–explanatory continuum formalised by Schwartz and Lellouch (1967) and later operationalised in the PRECIS framework, it asks whether an intervention works under conditions that approximate actual practice rather than ideal circumstances, making findings directly actionable for decision-makers and practitioners.A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Pragmatic Laboratory Experiment · Randomized Controlled Trial. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare