ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Pragmatisks laboratorijas eksperiments×Lauka eksperiments×
NozareEksperimentu plānošanaEksperimentu plānošana
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1967 (foundational distinction); 2009 (PRECIS operationalization)1920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
AutorsSchwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic–explanatory distinction); extended by PRECIS framework developersFormalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
TipsExperimental design philosophy and study typeExperimental design
PirmavotsSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumipragmatic experiment, applied laboratory trial, practice-oriented lab experiment, pragmatic controlled experimentfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
Saistītās35
KopsavilkumsA pragmatic laboratory experiment is a controlled study conducted in a laboratory setting that prioritises external validity and real-world applicability over the stringent internal controls characteristic of purely explanatory experiments. Drawing on the pragmatic–explanatory continuum formalised by Schwartz and Lellouch (1967) and later operationalised in the PRECIS framework, it asks whether an intervention works under conditions that approximate actual practice rather than ideal circumstances, making findings directly actionable for decision-makers and practitioners.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Pragmatic Laboratory Experiment · Field Experiment. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare