Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Marginalā strukturālā modelēšana politikas novērtēšanai× | Apgrieztā varbūtības svēršana (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Cēloņsakarību secināšana |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads | 2000 | 2000 |
| Autors≠ | James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Tips≠ | Causal inference / weighted regression | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Pirmavots≠ | Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550–560. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | MSM for policy evaluation, policy MSM, causal MSM, structural policy weighting model | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model (MSM) is a causal inference framework that estimates the population-average effect of a policy by using inverse probability weighting to create a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of measured confounders, enabling unbiased comparison of potential outcomes under different policy scenarios from observational data. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|