Salīdzināt metodes

	Politikas novērtēšana, izmantojot aptuveno precīzo saskaņošanu (CEM)	Apgrieztā varbūtības svēršana (IPW / IPTW)
Nozare	Cēloņsakarību secināšana	Cēloņsakarību secināšana
Saime	Regression model	Regression model
Izcelsmes gads	2011-2012	2000
Autors	Iacus, King & Porro	Robins, Hernán & Brumback
Tips	Matching / quasi-experimental design	Causal inference weighting estimator
Pirmavots	Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24.	Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560.
Citi nosaukumi	CEM, Coarsened Exact Matching, CEM policy evaluation, coarsening-based matching	IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Saistītās	5	5
Kopsavilkums	Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a quasi-experimental causal-inference technique that creates balanced treatment and control groups from observational data by temporarily coarsening covariates into bins, exactly matching units within those bins, and then pruning unmatched observations before estimating policy effects. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro, CEM belongs to the monotonic imbalance bounding family of matching methods and is especially popular in policy evaluation.	Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.