Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Miega noguruma skala (PFS)× | Vēža noguruma skala (CFS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Onkoloģijas māszinības | Onkoloģijas māszinības |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1989 | 2000 |
| Autors≠ | Barbara Piper | Takuo Okuyama |
| Tips≠ | Patient self-report multidimensional fatigue scale | Patient self-report three-dimensional fatigue scale |
| Pirmavots≠ | Piper, B. F., Dibble, S. L., Dodd, M. J., Weiss, M. C., Slater, G., & Paul, S. M. (1989). The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum, 16(6), 751–758. link ↗ | Okuyama, T., Akechi, T., Kugaya, A., et al. (2000). Development and validation of a cancer fatigue scale: a brief, three-dimensional, disease-specific instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage, 19(1), 5–14. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | PFS | CFS, Okuyama Fatigue Scale |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Piper Fatigue Scale is a 22-item multidimensional self-report instrument that evaluates cancer-related fatigue across four conceptually distinct domains: behavioral/severity, affective/meaning, sensory, and cognitive/mood. Developed by Barbara Piper and colleagues in 1989 and revised in 1998, the PFS is grounded in a theoretical model of fatigue mechanisms and is widely used in oncology research and clinical practice to assess treatment-related and disease-related fatigue. | The Cancer Fatigue Scale is a 15-item disease-specific self-report instrument that comprehensively assesses three dimensions of cancer-related fatigue: physical, cognitive, and emotional. Developed by Takuo Okuyama and colleagues at the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research and published in 2000, the CFS provides a brief yet multidimensional fatigue profile suitable for both clinical practice and research, with particular strength in non-English-speaking populations where it has been extensively validated. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|