Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Pilotēts randomizēts kontrolēts pētījums× | Kopas (klasteru) randomizēts kontrolēts pētījums× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Eksperimentu plānošana | Eksperimentu plānošana |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s (methodological formalization) | 1978–1980s |
| Autors≠ | Formalized through clinical trials methodology community | Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s) |
| Tips≠ | Experimental feasibility design | Experimental design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., ... & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 1. DOI ↗ | Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978 |
| Citi nosaukumi | pilot RCT, feasibility RCT, pilot trial, preliminary RCT | cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A pilot randomized controlled trial (pilot RCT) is a small-scale, fully randomized experiment conducted before a definitive RCT to test the feasibility of study procedures, estimate key parameters such as recruitment rates and effect-size variability, and identify practical barriers. It uses the same randomization, intervention, and measurement protocol as the planned full trial but on a fraction of the target sample. The goal is not to confirm efficacy but to refine and justify the main trial design. | A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|