Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Fenomenoloģiskā izpēte× | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1900s (Husserl); 1920s (Heidegger) | 1999 |
| Autors≠ | Edmund Husserl (descriptive) and Martin Heidegger (interpretive) | Jonathan A. Smith |
| Tips | Method | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Husserl, E. (1931). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff. link ↗ | Smith, J. A. (1999). Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and first-time motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 409–426. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Phenomenology, Descriptive Phenomenology, Interpretive Phenomenology | IPA, Interpretative Phenomenology |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Phenomenological research is a qualitative methodology focused on understanding the lived experience of a phenomenon as it is experienced by individuals. Rooted in the philosophical traditions of Edmund Husserl (descriptive phenomenology) and Martin Heidegger (interpretive phenomenology), this approach seeks to uncover the essential structures and meanings of human experience. | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) is a qualitative research methodology that explores how people make sense of significant personal experiences. Developed by Jonathan Smith (1999) and grounded in phenomenology and hermeneutics, IPA examines individual experience in detail before identifying shared patterns; it emphasizes the idiographic (particular) and operates on the principle of double hermeneutics: the researcher interprets participants' interpretations of their lived experience. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|