Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Dalības refleksīvā tēmu analīze× | Dalības darbības pētniecība (DPP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 (reflexive TA); participatory integration developed through 2010s–2020s | 1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); participatory application developed within participatory action research traditions | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Qualitative research method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953345 | Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Participatory RTA, collaborative reflexive thematic analysis, participant-involved thematic analysis, co-analytic reflexive thematic analysis | PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Participatory Reflexive Thematic Analysis (Participatory RTA) integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework with participatory research principles, actively involving participants as co-analysts in generating, reviewing, or refining themes from qualitative data. The approach is simultaneously a method of analysis and a form of member engagement, ensuring that the themes produced are grounded in participants' own meaning-making rather than imposed solely by the researcher. | Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|