Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Līdzdalīgā kvantitatīvi prioritārā jaukta dizaina pieeja× | Transformējošā jauktās metodes dizains× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētījuma dizains | Pētījuma dizains |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2003–2009 |
| Autors≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (core typology); Mertens (participatory-transformative lens) | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tips | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483358468 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Citi nosaukumi | QUAN-priority participatory mixed methods, community-based quantitative-priority mixed design, participatory QUAN-dominant mixed methods, PAR quantitative-priority mixed design | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Participatory quantitative-priority mixed design combines a community-engaged, participatory research framework with a mixed methods structure in which the quantitative strand carries primary weight. Stakeholders and community members co-shape research questions, instruments, and interpretation, while quantitative data provide the dominant evidence base and qualitative data serve a complementary, explanatory, or contextualizing role. This design is particularly suited to applied, evaluative, and social-justice-oriented inquiry where both statistical rigor and community voice are required. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|