Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Līdzdalīgā satura analīze× | Dalības darbības pētniecība (DPP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s–2000s (formalized in community-based and health research contexts) | 1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s |
| Autors≠ | Developed at the intersection of participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s) and qualitative content analysis traditions | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte |
| Tips | Qualitative research method | Qualitative research method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199811755 | Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | PCA, community-based content analysis, collaborative content analysis, participatory textual analysis | PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Participatory Content Analysis (PCA) is a qualitative method that integrates community members or stakeholders directly into the content analysis process. Rather than treating participants solely as data sources, PCA positions them as co-analysts who help develop coding categories, interpret textual data, and validate findings. This approach is widely used in health communication, education research, and community-based studies where insider knowledge and cultural context are essential to accurate interpretation. | Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|