ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Sāpju katastrofizēšanas skala×Makgilaus sāpju anketa×
NozareSāpju medicīnaSāpju medicīna
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19951975
AutorsMichael J. Sullivan and Steven R. BishopRonald Melzack
TipsSelf-report questionnaire measuring catastrophic thinking about painSelf-report questionnaire measuring multiple pain dimensions
PirmavotsSullivan, M.J., Bishop, S.R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524-532. DOI ↗Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1(3), 277-299. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiPCS, Catastrophizing ScaleMPQ, McGill Pain Index
Saistītās45
KopsavilkumsThe Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report questionnaire developed by Sullivan, Bishop, and Pivik in 1995 to measure catastrophic thinking about pain—the tendency to magnify pain threat, ruminate about pain, and feel helpless in response to pain. Elevated catastrophizing predicts worse pain outcomes and is a key treatment target in cognitive-behavioral pain management.The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a multidimensional pain assessment instrument developed by Ronald Melzack in 1975. It measures pain across sensory, affective, and evaluative dimensions, allowing clinicians and researchers to capture the qualitative experience of pain beyond simple intensity ratings. The MPQ remains one of the most widely used pain assessment tools in clinical and research settings.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Pain Catastrophizing Scale · McGill Pain Questionnaire. Izgūts 2026-06-20 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare