Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ordinālās testu-retesta uzticamība× | Test-retest uzticamība× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1904–1979 | 1904 |
| Autors≠ | Multiple contributors (Spearman, Cohen, Shrout & Fleiss) | Karl Pearson |
| Tips≠ | Reliability / temporal stability | Reliability estimate |
| Pirmavots≠ | Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497 |
| Citi nosaukumi | rank-based test-retest reliability, ordinal temporal consistency, Spearman test-retest reliability, weighted kappa test-retest | stability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability |
| Saistītās≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ordinal test-retest reliability quantifies how consistently an ordinal measurement instrument — such as a Likert-scale questionnaire or a rating tool — ranks or scores the same participants across two separate administrations separated by a stable interval, using correlation and agreement statistics suited to ordered categorical data. | Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|