Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ordinālā satura validitātes novērtēšana× | Mēroga izstrāde× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003 | 1991–1995 |
| Autors≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Tips≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Citi nosaukumi | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|