Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ordinālā satura validitātes novērtēšana× | Vienumu analīze (klasiskā testa teorija)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003 | 1979 |
| Autors≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986) |
| Tips≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Descriptive / psychometric screening |
| Pirmavots≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333 |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|