Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Uztura riska skrīninga metode NRS-2002 (NRS-2002)× | APACHE II rādītājs× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Klīniskā novērtēšana | Klīniskā novērtēšana |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2003 | 1985 |
| Autors≠ | Jens Kondrup, et al. | William A. Knaus, et al. |
| Tips≠ | Nutritional status and intervention need | ICU severity and mortality prediction |
| Pirmavots≠ | Kondrup, J., Allison, S. P., Elia, M., Vellas, B., & Plauth, M. (2003). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clinical Nutrition, 22(3), 415-421. DOI ↗ | Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1985). APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine, 13(10), 818-829. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | NRS-2002, Nutrition risk screening | APACHE-II, APACHE2 |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), developed by Kondrup et al. and endorsed by ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition), is a 7-point tool for identifying hospitalized patients at nutritional risk. It combines assessment of recent weight loss, dietary intake, disease severity, and age to stratify the need for nutritional intervention. | The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, introduced by Knaus et al. in 1985, is a 71-point severity of illness classification system for critically ill patients. It combines acute physiological parameters, age, and chronic health status to predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, facilitating patient risk stratification and research standardization. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|